Legal Opinion

Carter v. Mulrein

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1889No. 12203PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of Sau Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an action on an injunction bond alleged to have been executed by the defendant Mulrein as principal, and the other defendants as sureties, in a certain action in the superior court in which the said Mulrein was plaintiff, and I. S. Kalloch and Carter (the plaintiff herein) and others were defendants. Judgment (in the case at bar) went for plaintiff, and the defendants Alpers and Westphal, two of the sureties on the bond, appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.

The first point made by appellants is, that the complaint does not state a cause of action,—that point…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. People v. BusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Greenly v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Maier v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Elmore & Womble v. ThaggardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API