Legal Opinion

People v. Adams

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 17, 2010No. 1-08-0455PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Toomin

In the case at hand, we confront a constitutional challenge to the offense of armed habitual criminal, bottomed on due process and ex post facto concerns. Following a jury trial, defendant, Jacoby Adams, was found guilty of armed habitual criminal and sentenced to a term of 30 years’ imprisonment. Defendant now appeals contending: (1) the armed habitual criminal statute is facially unconstitutional and violates ex post facto principles; (2) the State’s amendment of the indictment implicated his speedy trial rights and his counsel was ineffective by not raising the issue; (3) his motion to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. NovakIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. EylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. ReidIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. People v. YaworskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API