People v. Thomas
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neville
Justices Murphy and Steele concurred in the judgment and opinion.
OPINION
Following a bench trial, the trial court found that Móntate Thomas violated the armed habitual criminal statute. 720 ILCS 5/24—1.7 (West 2006). On appeal, Thomas contends that: (1) the prosecution did not prove that he committed two prior forcible felonies, because the prosecution did not show that Thomas’s prior conviction for attempted murder qualified as a forcible felony; (2) his trial counsel did not provide effective assistance; and (3) the armed habitual criminal statute violates the ex post facto clauses of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. HatteryIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. DuniganIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BelkIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. LeonardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- People v. MosleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
- People v. WoodenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- People v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. SchultzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.