Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 2011No. 1-09-0398 RelPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neville

Justices Murphy and Steele concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

Following a bench trial, the trial court found that Móntate Thomas violated the armed habitual criminal statute. 720 ILCS 5/24—1.7 (West 2006). On appeal, Thomas contends that: (1) the prosecution did not prove that he committed two prior forcible felonies, because the prosecution did not show that Thomas’s prior conviction for attempted murder qualified as a forcible felony; (2) his trial counsel did not provide effective assistance; and (3) the armed habitual criminal statute violates the ex post facto clauses of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. People v. HatteryIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. DuniganIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. BelkIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. LeonardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. People v. MosleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
  3. People v. WoodenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. People v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. People v. SchultzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API