Legal Opinion

Krauss v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2000No. 30264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order denying appellant’s post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, appellant alleged: (1) that his trial counsel was ineffective; and (2) that the State failed to prove the prior convictions for driving while under the influence (DUI) required to enhance appellant’s present conviction to felony, third-offense DUI. See NRS 484.3792(2). Although we conclude that appellant’s claims lack merit, we issue this opinion to establish that a defendant charged with felony DUI may stipulate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Campbell v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Robertson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Davenport v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Davenport v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Hudson v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Sparks v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hodges v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Adakai (Nathan) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API