Legal Opinion

Sparks v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2005No. 43593PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*109OPINION

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we consider whether a provision of the written plea agreement known as the “failure to appear” (FTA) clause is legally enforceable. The FTA clause releases the State from its promise to recommend, or refrain from recommending, a particular sentence if the defendant fails to appear for a scheduled sentencing proceeding or commits an additional criminal offense prior to sentencing. We conclude that the FTA clause is valid under Nevada law. Accordingly, in this case, the State did not breach the plea agreement by exercising its right under that provision to argue for the…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. FreeseNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Van Buskirk v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sheriff, Clark County v. LuqmanNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Citti v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kluttz v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. GONZALES (MELVIN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Tri-County Equipment & Leasing, LLC v. KlinkeNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Buckner (Donald) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Burd (Travis) v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Floyd (Zane) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API