Legal Opinion
United Keetoowah Band v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 31, 2007No. 03-1433LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*304ORDER DENYING PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is the Cherokee Nation’s (“CNO”) motion for leave to intervene in the above-captioned case pursuant to Rule 24(b)(2) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).1 CNO contends that its claims and defenses involve common questions of law and fact with the plaintiffs, United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma (“plaintiff’ or “UKB”), complaint and, accordingly, that permissive intervention would be appropriate. The plaintiff opposes CNO’s motion, arguing first that this court does…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Robert E. Morris and Carol L. Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Chippewa Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Aeroplate Corp., a California Corporation v. the United States 12-374c andUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- M.E.S., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011