Legal Opinion
First Bank of Marietta v. Mascrete
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 1998No. 95CA4PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
Roslovic & Partners, Inc. (“Roslovic”) appeals from a judgment entered by the Washington County Court of Common Pleas, finding it in contempt of the court’s garnishment order and entering judgment in favor of First Bank of Marietta against Roslovic in the amount of $20,000 with interest and costs. Roslovic also appeals from a judgment which denied its motions for a new trial and for relief from judgment. Roslovic raises the following errors:
“I. The court below erred in determining that Roslovic has funds or property that belonged to the judgment debtor and was in contempt of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- E. Liverpool v. Buckeye Water Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Doss v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Scarnecchia v. Rebhan, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Cortland United Methodist Church v. Knowles, 2006-T-0110 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- First Bank v. Roslovic & Partners, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.