Legal Opinion
Consolidated Fibers, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 30, 2006No. Slip Op 06-175; Court 06-00134PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GORDON, Judge.
Defendant and Defendant-Intervenors move to dismiss count two of Plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1), and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(5). For the reasons set forth below, the motions are denied.
I. Background
During the five-year (“sunset”) reviews of the antidumping duty orders on polyester staple fiber (“PSF”) from Korea and Taiwan, Plaintiffs requested that the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) institute a proceeding to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gould, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Consolidated Fibers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikalari T.A.Ş. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'nUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024