Legal Opinion

Duty Free Shoppers Group Ltd. v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1989No. S-2538PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This appeal raises the question whether an indemnity provision in a state airport concession lease requires the lessee to indemnify the state for a settlement, costs, and attorney’s fees resulting from an injury sustained by an employee of the lessee. The superior court ruled that the state was entitled to indemnity as a matter of law. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Duty Free Shoppers Group Limited leased retail, warehouse and office space to operate a duty-free store at the Anchorage International Airport. The lease contained the following indemnity…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Burgess Construction Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United Airlines, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Department & Public Facilities v. Houston Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State, Department & Public Facilities v. Houston Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API