Duty Free Shoppers Group Ltd. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
This appeal raises the question whether an indemnity provision in a state airport concession lease requires the lessee to indemnify the state for a settlement, costs, and attorney’s fees resulting from an injury sustained by an employee of the lessee. The superior court ruled that the state was entitled to indemnity as a matter of law. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Duty Free Shoppers Group Limited leased retail, warehouse and office space to operate a duty-free store at the Anchorage International Airport. The lease contained the following indemnity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Burgess Construction Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- United Airlines, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Department & Public Facilities v. Houston Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- State, Department & Public Facilities v. Houston Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990