Legal Opinion
Integra LifeSciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaA
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 6, 2003No. Nos. 02-1052, 01-1065PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part opinion filed by Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN.
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that Merck KgaA (Merck) infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 4,988,621 (’621 patent), 4,792,525 (’525 patent) 5,695,997 (’997 patent), 4,879,237 (’237 patent), and 4,789,734 (’734 patent), belonging to Integ-ra Lifesciences I, Ltd., the Burnham Institute and Telios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1 (Integra). The district court held that subsection (e) of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corporation and Elan Corporation, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Glaxo, Inc., and Glaxo Group Limited v. Novopharm, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Alden W. Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Benitec Australia, Ltd. v. Nucleonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- MercExchange, L.L.C. v. eBay, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Pfizer Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.