Legal Opinion

Cary v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

On or about December 1, 1927, one Brita Engstrom, executed to the Portland Trust and Savings Bank of Portland, Oregon, her promissory note in the sum of $1,900, interest to be paid semiannually, and an installment of $60 on the principal to be paid in June and December of each year until paid in full. The payment of the note was secured by the execution of a mortgage to the payee therein on certain real estate which she then owned. Thereafter, by mesne conveyance, one Mary Farnsworth became the owner, subject to said mortgage, of said real estate; and by due assignment, the defendant became…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. State ex rel. Pierce v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Nugent v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Blalock v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Monese v. StruveOregon Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API