Legal Opinion

McGill v. Baker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1930No. 22366. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

Respondent brought this action to recover from appellants certain moneys which be claimed to bave advanced to one McDonald, and also to recover certain damages. When tbe cause was first tried in tbe lower court, at tbe close of respondent’s case, a judgment of dismissal was entered, and appealed to this court, where tbe judgment was reversed. (McGill v. Baker, 147 Wash. 394, 266 Pac. 138). There after the case was called again for trial, and it was stipulated that:. . the plaintiff offers in evidence the statement of facts in the first trial of this case, on February 8, 1927, as his evidence,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hammock v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. McGill v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Furth v. SnellWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hammock v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Greene v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API