Legal Opinion
Pumphrey v. Quillen
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1955No. 4539PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.
This was an action in tort for deceit, brought by Charles E. and Dora B. Pumphrey, husband and wife, as purchasers of a house and lot from Neal T. and Kittie E. Quillen, also husband and wife, through the alleged agency of Hudson J. Force and Bethel W. Taylor, realtors.
It was claimed in the petition that the Quillens, owners of the premises, employed one, Force, to obtain a purchaser for this property, and that “thereafter said Force, by virtue of some arrangement the exact nature of which is unknown to the plaintiffs, employed the defendant Taylor to aid and assist him in procuring the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Drew v. Christopher Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- Boss v. TomarasMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Webb v. JohnstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Houston v. AveryOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Polly v. CharouhisMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Doyle v. Fairfield Machine Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Warnecke v. ChaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.