Drew v. Christopher Construction Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The decision of this case turns upon the question of the validity and sufficiency of the cross-petition and the admissibility of evidence proffered in support thereof. The trial court held that the pleading and the evidence proffered contradicted or varied the terms of the written agreement between the parties for the purchase and sale of the property involved herein. The question presented is whether, by reason of a clause in a purchase and sale agreement referring to the premises as “the following described property * * * together with all buildings and appurtenances now thereon, in their…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Ackmann v. Keeney-Toelle Real Estate CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Mitchem v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Finomore v. EpsteinOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Galmish v. CicchiniOhio Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.