Houston v. Avery
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*145OPINION
By FUNK, PJ.
Counsel for each defendant claim, first, that there is no evidence that a conspiracy existed between the defendants in the transaction with plaintiff, and second, that, so far as their respective clients are concerned, the verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
The' claim of counsel for defendants that there is no evidence of a conspiracy be*146tween defendants, seems to be based largely upon the idea that there is no evidence showing that they had met together concerning this deal prior to the time of the closing of the deal in the office of said Strobel…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Pumphrey v. QuillenOhio Court of Appeals · 1955