Legal Opinion

Lepper v. Randall

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 3, 1902No. 12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill which charges infringement of letters patent No. 624,839, dated May 9, 1899, for “wrappers for hams.” 105 Fed. 975. The specification states that:

The “invention consists of a wrapper for boiling a ham therein, more particularly a boneless ham, the same being formed, of a piece of canvas or other suitable fabric adapted to envelop a ham, and means for tightly compressing the wrapper thereon and preventing opening thereof, whereby the ham is guarded against disintegration and its juices are retained within the wrapper, thus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bundy Mfg. Co. v. Detroit Time-Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. Boston & R. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Bemis Car-Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1897
  3. Societe Anonyme Usine J. Cleret v. RehfussU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Hillborn v. Hale & Kilburn Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1895
  5. Lepper v. RandallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Albright v. LangfeldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Kahn v. StarrellsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  3. Queen & Co. v. GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1913
  5. Levy v. HarrisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API