Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Starrells

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 13, 1905No. 43PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Eor opinion below, see 131 Fed. 464.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The decree of the Circuit Court dismissed a bill of the appellants which charged the appellee with infringement of all three claims of patent No. 669,011, dated February 26, 1901, issued to Nathan E. Kahn, assignor to Adella Kahn and Arthur H. Stephenson, for “flat knit cap and art of making same.” The first two claims are for a method of forming flat knit caps, and the third claim is for the flat knit cap produced by that method, as a new article of manufacture. We think the court below was clearly right in holding the third claim to be invalid, and we deem it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lepper v. RandallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Stephenson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  2. Pressed Prism Plate Glass Co. v. Continuous Glass Press Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Kahn v. StarrellsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API