Legal Opinion
Queen & Co. v. Green
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 1909No. 73PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On Motion to Punish for Contempt.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
A preliminary injunction was granted in this case in December, 1908 (165 Fed. 453), and was served upon the intervener, Green, who is the principal party defendant and is making the only contest against the patent. The injunction was served in January, 1909, and commands the defendant to—
* * * desist and refrain from further constructing or using or selling in any way or manner, directly or indirectly, the N-ray tubes described or mentioned in the said bill of complaint, or making, using, or selling, or causing to be made, used, or sold, any X-ray tubes made in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cary Mfg. Co. v. Acme Flexible Clasp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- Calculagraph Co. v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1905
- Matthews v. SpangenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
- Lepper v. RandallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
- Bate Refrigerating Co. v. GillettUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Radio Corporation v. Cable Radio Tube CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Otis Elevator Co. v. 570 Building Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1913