Legal Opinion

Shore v. Peterson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2009No. 34488PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

In the bench trial of this action to collect on a promissory note, the district court found that an accord and satisfaction had discharged the defendant’s liability on the note. However, the court declined to award the defendant his costs and attorney fees. Both parties appealed to this Court. We affirm the judgment on the merits but vacate the ruling regarding costs and fees.

I

Rod Peterson ran his farm equipment repair business, Countryside Farm Repair (CFR), as a sole proprietorship until it was incorporated on August 6, 1997. Once CFR became incorporated, Peterson served…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Eighteen Mile Ranch, LLC v. Nord Excavating & Paving, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Intermountain Forest Management, Inc. v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Nelson v. ArmstrongIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Idaho Military Historical Society, Inc. v. MaslenIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. City of Meridian v. PETRA Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Weisel v. BEAVER SPRINGS OWNERS ASS'N, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Kuhn v. COLDWELL BANKER LANDMARK, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API