Legal Opinion

Lees v. Case-Hoyt Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 23, 1991No. Civ. 90-0163LPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Case-Hoyt Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Maxine Lees filed this action against her former employer, Case-Hoyt, alleging race and sex discrimination in violation of Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the claim of wage discrimination is denied, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the claim of retaliatory harassment is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Maxine Lees, a black female, was hired by the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Woods v. BentsenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Wado v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
  3. Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1995
  4. Zenni v. Hard Rock Cafe International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Hines v. Hillside Children's CenterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API