Legal Opinion

De Mull v. City of Lowell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1962No. Docket 33, Calendar 49,517PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Appeal and cross-appeal from a decree entered in the Kent circuit upholding plaintiff’s nonconforming use of his property as against the defendant city’s zoning ordinance and upholding as against plaintiff that part of the ordinance which, by specific time limitation, will terminate such nonconforming use July 28, 1963. *

As in most like collisions of the municipal power of zoning with private rights of use of property, the-, issues are fact-complicated and subject to disputatious inferences and conclusions depending on professional as well as lay point of view. All such issues were considered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. City of WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Dingeman Advertising, Inc. v. Algoma TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Heath Township v. SallMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API