Legal Opinion
California Optometric Assn. v. Lackner
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1976No. Civ. 15240PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, J.
The Director of the state Department of Public Health is required to adhere to the Administrative Procedure Act (specifically Gov. Code, §§ 11420-11427) in adopting rules and regulations establishing the rates which the state will pay for health care supplied to Medi-Cal patients. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 10553.1, 10554, 10554.1, 14105, 14124.5; California Assn. of Nursing Homes etc., Inc. v. Williams (1970) 4 Cal.App.3d 800 [84 Cal.Rptr. 590, 85 Cal.Rptr. 735].)
The present appeal stems from a declaratory relief action filed by the California Optometric Association…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- California Citizens Band Accociation, Incorporated, a Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Ford Dealers Assn. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mahdavi v. Fair Employment Practice Com.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Reyes v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.