Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wright v. District Court in & for the County of Jefferson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 18, 1983No. 82SA371Published

1DissentHodges, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. The majority holding in my view is contrary to the actual language of our statute, is contrary to our case law, and is contrary to accepted parameters of judicial decision because it amounts to judicial legislation.

It is a firmly established principle of Colorado law in workmen’s compensation cases that coemployees are precluded from suing one another for negligent actions causing injury in the course of their employment. The many cases enunciating this principle and its rationale are set forth in Kandt v. Evans, 645 P.2d 1300 (Colo.1982). See also Ellis v. Rocky…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Garcia v. IsersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Ellis v. Rocky Mountain Empire Sports, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Babich v. PavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Hoffman v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API