Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Rogers
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 3, 1972No. Civ. 38383PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JEFFERSON, J.
Plaintiff James K. Hoffman appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to the granting of a motion for summary judgment made by J. F. Rogers, M.D., one of two defendants named in the original complaint.
Plaintiff contends that the affidavits filed by defendant Rogers are insufficient to establish that no issue of fact exists.
On February 1, 1969, plaintiff filed a complaint alleging, in substance, that defendants Rogers and Glassman were both physicians and surgeons licensed to practice medicine and surgery in California with offices at identified locations; that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Deauville v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- McIvor v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Wickham v. North American Rockwell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Douglas v. E. & J. GALLO WINERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Magliulo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Royster v. MontanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ross v. SchubertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.