Legal Opinion

In re DeSalvo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Frank J. DeSalvo, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 25, 1969, under the name Frank Joseph *323DeSalvo. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

By petition dated January 12, 1993, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that respondent has been automatically disbarred, as a consequence of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. In re CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. In re SimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. In re NapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. In re NovodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re FreedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re GelleneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re ChianeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re McSherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Matter of KelleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API