In re Napoli

OPINION OF THE COURT

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the Second Judicial Department on December 18, 1967. At all times relevant herein, the respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department. The respondent was convicted, after a jury trial *136in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, of violating 18 USC §§ 1961 and 1962 (c) in that he bribed a witness and conspired to commit racketeering acts.

The charges arose out of the respondent’s activities as a trial attorney for the Morris J. Eisen…