Legal Opinion

In re Chianese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 20, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*88OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Arthur L. Chianese, was admitted to the practice of law in New York State by the First Judicial Department on July 6, 1987, as Arthur Louis Chianese. He is also admitted to the practice of law in New Jersey. Respondent has not maintained a law office nor practiced law in New York; however, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the Committee) has jurisdiction over misconduct committed by respondent elsewhere, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.1.

On March 20, 1997, following a jury trial in Monmouth County, New Jersey, respondent was found guilty of third-degree…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re DeSalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re LinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of TobiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. In re FelsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Matter of O'DonnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  4. Matter of ValandinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API