Legal Opinion
Brooksbank v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 8, 1998No. C2-98-391Published
1Opinion of the Court
586 N.W.2d 789 (1998)
James BROOKSBANK, Respondent,
v.
Harlan ANDERSON, Appellant,
Precision Mix, Inc., f/k/a Total Mix Ration, Inc., Defendant.
No. C2-98-391.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
December 8, 1998.
Review Denied January 27, 1999.
David K. Snyder, Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling, P.L.L.P., Stillwater, for respondent.
Larry J. Peterson, Larry J. Peterson & Associates, St. Paul, for appellant.
Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Judge, and THOREEN[*], Judge.
OPINION
ANDERSON, Judge.
Respondent James Brooksbank brought an action against appellant Harlan Anderson to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Harrington v. HarringtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Estrada v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.