Torigian v. Saunders
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.
In this litigation plaintiff Torigian seeks a judgment declaring our butterfat tax law unconstitutional. The defendants, other than the Attorney General, are the officers and directors of the American Dairy Association of South Dakota. They moved to dismiss the action for the reason that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and for the further reason that plaintiff did not have standing to prosecute the same. The motion was granted. On plaintiff’s election not to amend, a judgment of dismissal was entered. This appeal is from that judgment. The action was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- State ex rel. State Reclamation Board v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Parsons v. South Dakota Lottery CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Kanaly v. State by and Through JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.