Duncan v. Peterson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PIERCE, P. J.
This is a dispute over a 104-foot wide strip of land which lies adjacent to the true north-south line dividing two parcels of land. Plaintiffs Duncan are record owners of the east one-half and defendants Peterson of the west one-half of section 26 1 of a certain township in Butte County. The trial court quieted title to the disputed strip in the Petersons, On the Duncans’ appeal we agree with their contention that a fence lying for many years along the west line of the land in question is a boundary agreed upon between the parties and their predecessors. Thus the judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Vick v. GrasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vella v. RattoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Joaquin v. Shiloh OrchardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Oswald v. Murray Plumbing & Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Salazar v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Salazar v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996