Legal Opinion · Dissent

Salazar v. Terry

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 12, 1996No. 94SC704Published

1DissentJustice Kourlis

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that fifteen days of common ownership of the two tracts of land in question here served to erase a boundary long recognized as being marked by a fence over 100 years old.

This ease concerns the integrity of the boundary fence between plaintiffs’ and defendants’ lands. The fence has been in existence since the 1880’s.1 Following trial, the court in this case found that the fence had been recognized as the actual boundary line by all previous owners of the parcels from 1914 until 1989, when plaintiffs first asserted their claim that the fence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Reed v. . FarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Edgeller v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Finley v. Yuba County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Sachs v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API