Fabrizio v. Glaser
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
In this medical malpractice action arising out of the defendant’s alleged failure to obtain the plaintiff’s informed consent, the plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a jury verdict for the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly denied his motion for a directed verdict and his motion to set aside the ver-*459diet because, contrary to the jury's conclusion, the plaintiff in fact commenced his action within three years of the act or omission complained of, as required by General Statutes § 52-584.1 The defendant argues, as an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Stone v. BastaracheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- McLaughlin v. BronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Colucci v. PinetteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Gaulton v. Reno Paint & Wallpaper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Thames River Recycling, Inc. v. GalloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. KellerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Fabrizio v. GlaserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.