Legal Opinion

Light v. Westbury Shopping Center, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

Defendants move (1) to strike out as sham all or part of specified paragraphs of the amended complaint and each of the four causes of action therein contained and (2) to dismiss each of said causes of action for legal insufficiency.

The action is to recover brokerage commissions. The gravamen of each cause of action is in substance as follows: of the *1004first, that the corporate defendant willfully defaulted on its contract to purchase certain real property; of the second, that the corporate defendant was the alter ego of the individual defendants to whom all sums advanced on the contract were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Carthage Tissue Paper Mills v. Village of CarthageNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Levy v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caliendo v. McFarlandNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mardan Construction Corp. v. Rogers Auto Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API