Legal Opinion

Murad Williams v. Thomas Birkett

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 29, 2012No. 10-1441PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The warden appeals Murad Williams’s unconditional grant of federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court held that the habeas petition was filed within the one-year time limit of AEDPA based in part on the court’s determination that Williams’s untimely second state collateral attack was “properly filed” so as to toll the limitations period. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). Because Michigan law does not allow the filing of second motions for post-conviction relief, with two exceptions not applicable in Williams’s case, Williams’s second motion was not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Robertson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. David Palmer v. Howard Carlton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Does v. MunozCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Carter v. KleeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  2. Henderson v. BuntingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  3. Ray v. BaumanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. Dewitt McDonald, Jr. v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Stephen Kares v. Bryan MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API