Legal Opinion

Does v. Munoz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2007No. 06-2498PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants John Does II — III appeal the district court’s order dismissing their challenge to the constitutionality of Michigan’s Setting Aside Convictions Act (“SACA”), Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 780.621-780.624 (2002), and Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA”), Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 28.721-28.732 (2002). On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the district court erred when it found that they had suffered no substantive due process or equal protection violations from the requirement that they register and appear on Michigan’s Public Sex Offender…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Grinter v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Lambert v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Seegmiller v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API