Jackson v. Ivory
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Hannah, Justice.
Appellant Keith Jackson appeals the summary judgment order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Second Division, which dismissed his claim of professional negligence against Chantel Mullen and his claims of respondeat superior and negHgent supervision against George Ivory, Jr. (“Ivory”), and the Ivory Law Firm. On appeal, Jackson argues that: (1) Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-310 (Supp. 1993) does not bar his claim of professional negHgence against MuHen; (2) a material factual dispute remains as to whether Jackson was in privity with MuHen; (3) a material factual dispute remains…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of WynneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Clark v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- McDonald v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Madden v. AldrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Spears v. City of FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- L. Walter Quinn, III Terry Quinn v. Ocwen Federal Bank Fsb Wilson & Associates, P.L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Hardin v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Saine v. Comcast Cablevision of Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Turner v. Northwest Arkansas Neurosurgery Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Williams v. Arkansas Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.