Legal Opinion
Bolden v. Watt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 17, 1986No. 86-90PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
The appellants were denied permits to operate taxicabs in the City of Little Rock. They filed suit in the circuit court alleging that the city ordinance relied on to deny them permits was unconstitutional and void under Article 12, Section 4 of the Arkansas Constitution, and Ark. Stat. Ann. § 71-2601 et seq. (Repl. 1979). The trial court upheld the ordinance and dismissed the complaint. We find that the trial court was correct in upholding the ordinance.
The facts are not in dispute. The appellants were denied permits to drive taxicabs in the City of Little Rock…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sargent v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- City of North Little Rock v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Vandiver v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Benton v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Louisiana Oil Refining Company v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
3Cited by107 opinions
- Love v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Brock v. TownsellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Arkansas Vinegar Co. v. AshbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Klinger v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Reeder v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.