Legal Opinion

Boles v. Hotel Maytag Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1936No. 43127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is the second time this case has been before this court. Boles v. Hotel Maytag Co., 218 Iowa 306, 253 N. W. 515.

The writer of this opinion found it necessary to dissent in the former appeal. But when the opinion was adopted by a majority of this court, it became the law. The only right the minority has is to express its views, which right was exercised in this case. See dissenting opinion, 218 Iowa, page 317, 253 N. W. 520.

If this case were here on the record now before us as an original submission, the writer would find himself again compelled to dissent, but with the law of the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larrabee v. Des Moines Tent & Awning Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Boles v. Hotel Maytag Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Aita v. John Beno Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Class v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Highland Golf Club of Iowa Falls v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  4. Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Pierce v. GrubenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API