Legal Opinion
State v. Woerner
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 1984No. 83AP-540 and 83AP-785PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, P.J.
Defendants-appellants, Therron Woerner and Ralph J. Dupler, entered no contest pleas to violations of R.C. 4511.19(A)(3), after which the court found them guilty as charged and sentenced them accordingly. The appeals raise identical assignments of error and are combined for disposition.
Defendants have asserted the following assignments of error:
“I. Section 4511.19(A)(3) Ohio Revised Code fails to adequately notify the accused as to the act that is prohibited and as such violates due process of law as required by the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution..“II. Section 4511.19(A)(3)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. DorsoOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Greaves v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Columbus v. NewOhio Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Van FossenOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. PistoleOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. TopoloskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. PeprahFranklin County Municipal Court · 2006
- State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003