Legal Opinion

State v. Pistole

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1984No. 83AP-1222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorris, J.

Defendant-appellant, Stephen D. Pistole, raises the following assignment of error:

“Ohio Revised Code Section 4511.19 (A)(3) is constitutionally defective because it fails to provide motorists with reasonable means of ascertaining and avoiding the conduct proscribed by the statute.”

To the extent that the assignment of error contends that R.C. 4511.19(A)(3) is unconstitutionally vague and therefore void, the assignment of error is overruled on the authority of State v. Woerner (1984), 16 Ohio App. 3d 59.

Appellant’s contention that it was not within the power of the General Assembly to impose…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ConleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hanewald v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. State v. WoernerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HammondSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. City of Wichita v. HullCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API