Legal Opinion
State v. Van Fossen
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 26, 1984No. 83AP-995PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
Defendant, Daryl Van Fossen, appeals from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle with a concentration of alcohol of .1 gram or more per two hundred ten liters of breath, R.C. 4511.19(A)(3), and speeding, entered by the Franklin County Municipal Court. He raises three assignments of error, as follows:
“1. The trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to dismiss the charges in that no circumstantial indication was present to provide probable cause to arrest the defendant for OMVL
“2. The trial court erred in overrul ing the defendant’s motion to suppress statements that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. BuchholzOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Richard McCarty v. Captain HerdmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MedcalfOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. LloydOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. Raleigh, 2007-Ca-31 (10-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- City of Akron v. KirbyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. GastonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.