Legal Opinion

Zaldana v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 2013No. COA13-318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

Julio Alberto Martinez Zaldana (“plaintiff”) appeals from an opinion and award by the Full Commission of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (“the Commission”). The opinion and award concluded that defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company (“Auto-Owners”) was not liable for any benefits owed to plaintiff pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act. We affirm.

On 9 December 2008, defendant Horace Smith d/b/a Carolina Construction Company (“Smith”) obtained a workers’ compensation *135insurance policy (“the policy”) from Auto-Owners with an effective date of 4 December 2008. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Ferguson v. RiddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. County of CurrituckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Roanoke Country Club, Inc. v. Town of WilliamstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API