Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 2008No. 102A08PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSON, Justice.

This workers’ compensation case concerns two issues: 1) sufficiency of notice to the employer of an injury by accident, and 2) whether competent evidence supported the Industrial Commission’s findings about the need to replace plaintiff’s left breast implant. We conclude that in enacting N.C.G.S. § 97-22, the General Assembly did not intend to require an injured worker to give written notice when the employer has actual notice of her on-the-job injury, as the employer had here. Further, we find the evidence of the need to replace the left implant to be insufficient. As…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Legette v. Scotland Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Gregory v. W.A. Brown & SonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Morgan v. Morgan Motor Co. of AlbemarleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Philbeck v. University of MichiganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Carr v. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & ProcessingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API