Mudd v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
Petitioner Richard Mudd, who operates a real estate management company, appeals from the April 23, 1987, decision of the Rental Housing Commission (RHC) affirming the Rental Accommodations and Conversion Division’s (RACD) award of treble damages against him under D.C.Code § 45-1591(a) (1981). He contends that the assessment was an abuse of discretion because it was “totally unreasonable and highly unfair.” He argues first that the statute is unconstitutional because it vests in the Rent Administrator absolute discretion to assess treble damages without any limiting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- DeLevay v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cohen v. Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Jerome Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989