Legal Opinion

United States v. Intrados/International Management Group

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 14, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-0769(RMU)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss the Defendants’ Counterclaim Without Prejudice and Inviting the Parties to Brief the Option of a Limited Stay of Proceedings

URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This qui tam action arises from our nation’s privatization of foreign commerce markets. The United States (“the plaintiff’ or “the government”) brings suit un der the False Claims Act (“FCA”), as amended, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, and various common-law theories. The defendants assert a counterclaim for recoupment, 1 alleging that the plaintiff is in breach of contract. The…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. United States v. Renda Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Havard v. Perdue Farms, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  5. Pueblo of Zuni v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API