Fox v. Custis
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.
This appeal is from an order in three consolidated damage suits brought against state parole officers arising from crimes committed by a parolee. We determine whether the trial court erred in sustaining demurrers to the several amended motions for judgment.
Because the cases were decided on demurrer, we will consider the allegations pursuant to the settled rule that a demurrer admits the truth of all well-pleaded material facts. All reasonable factual inferences fairly and justly drawn from the facts alleged must be considered in aid of the pleading. However, a demurrer does not admit the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Fox v. CustisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Lamb v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. DowdySupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Russo v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Ward's Equipment, Inc. v. New Holland North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- Delk v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Fuste v. Riverside Healthcare Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.