Legal Opinion
Davis v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 18, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02635Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS BRENDA J. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:20-cv-02635-HLT JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This is a product-liability action. Plaintiff Brenda J. Davis seeks damages from Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. for injuries arising out of the use of Prolift+M pelvic mesh. This case was part of multidistrict litigation known as In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2327, and was transferred back to the District of Kansas following consolidated pretrial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Ronald E. Henderson v. Inter-Chem Coal Co., Inc. Nationwide Mining, Inc., a Kansas Corporation and Brent NationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.