Legal Opinion

Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Dodd

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 19, 1903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

•Case 25 — 'Action by John L. Dodd and Others, Minority Stockholders in the Louisville Bridge Company against the Bridge Co., L. & N. R. R. Co., Jeffersonville, Madison & .Indianapolis R. R. Co., B. & 0. Sv W., as Successor of the O. & M. R. R. Co., and the P. C. C. & ST. L. R. R. Co., to Compel the Railroads Named to Provide, and the Bridge Company to Collect from Them a Sum ¡Sufficient to Pay the Deficit in Certain Dividends, and fob Breach of Contract.

Read the full summary

•Case 25 — 'Action by John L. Dodd and Others, Minority Stockholders in the Louisville Bridge Company against the Bridge Co., L. & N. R. R. Co., Jeffersonville, Madison & .Indianapolis R. R. Co., B. & 0. Sv W., as Successor of the O. & M. R. R. Co., and the P. C. C. & ST. L. R. R. Co., to Compel the Railroads Named to Provide, and the Bridge Company to Collect from Them a Sum ¡Sufficient to Pay the Deficit in Certain Dividends, and fob Breach of Contract. APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. Judgment for Plaintiffs for Part of Their Demand and Defendants Appeal, and Pile…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the court by

JUDGE O’REAR,

appirming in cross appeal AND REVERSING ON DEPENDANTS’ APPEAL.

The Louisville Bridge Company was incorporated by an act of the Legislature in 1856, with authority to build a railroad toll bridge across the Ohio river at Louisville. The bridge wa® not built and completed till about 1870. The charter of the bridge company authorized it “to contract, at an agreed sum or rate, with any railroad company chartered by the State of Kentucky, or any other State of the United States, for the annual use of said bridge by the cars or for the purposes of said railroad…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Rogers v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  5. Roberts v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zahn v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Louisville Bridge Co. v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Taylor, County Jailer v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Madison Trust Co. v. StahlmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API