Dillard & Coffin Co. v. Richmond Cotton Oil Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County —Hon. P. H. Heiskell and Israel H. Peres, Chancellors.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lansden
The bill in this case was filed against the Richmond Cotton Oil Company, a Tennessee corporation, the Planters’ Gin Company, a Missouri corporation, and *292the Buckeye Cotton Oil Company, an Ohio corporation, to recover a balance of account in favor of complainant and carried upon its books against the defendant, the Planters’ Gin Company. There was a decree in the court below in favor of complainant against all of the defendants, and the Buckeye Cotton Oil Company has appealed therefrom and assigned numerous errors.
In 1906 the Planters’ Gin Company was organized under the following…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Citizens' Central Nat. Bank of NY v. AppletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Rankin v. EmighSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Miller v. Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Marble Co. v. HarveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Transamerica Leasing, Inc. v. La Republica De Venezuela and Fondo De Inversiones De VenezuelaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Herman v. Mobile Homes Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.