Legal Opinion

In re E.Q.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1992No. 3-91-474-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Chief Justice.

The district court, sitting as the juvenile court,1 found that E.Q. engaged in delinquent conduct and committed him to the Texas Youth Commission for a determinate sentence of fifteen years. We find that the trial court erred in denying E.Q.’s motion for new trial, as his pleas of “true” were not freely and voluntarily given. Accordingly, we will reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause for further proceedings with instructions that E.Q. be allowed to withdraw his pleas of “true” and be granted a new trial.

BACKGROUND

E.Q., a minor, was charged with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGuire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. R.L.H., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Lanes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Huffman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re J.D.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. In Re HallTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In the Interest of D.Z., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. In re J.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. In re S.L.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API